Re: 綠色電子產品排行:任天堂墊底 三星東芝列第一 - 生態環境討論
By Eartha
at 2008-03-24T08:45
at 2008-03-24T08:45
Table of Contents
補充一下,綠色和平的完整報告網址:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/
how-the-companies-line-up
(縮址:http://tinyurl.com/cc4j9)
我自己是覺得這份報告做的很用心,
網頁上有每個廠牌的單獨報告,從圖表可以很清楚看到分數是怎麼來的
(不過要先花點時間看說明就是了)
另一個重要的資訊是每次報告排名的變化,
如果一直穩定往前,
那該企業想要走環保路線的企圖就比較明顯。
18個廠牌的分數排序是
7.7 Samsung - Scores well on toxic chemicals policy.
Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.
7.7 Toshiba - Continued improvement, especially on e-waste and
recycling policy.
7.3 Nokia - Strong on toxic chemicals elimination but penalty
point for deficiencies in takeback practice remains.
7.3 Sony - More products free of toxic PVC and improved reporting
on recycling and takeback especially in the US.
7.3 Dell - Unchanged since the last version, still no products on
the market without the worst chemicals.
7.3 Lenovo - Unchanged since the last version, still no products
on the market without the worst chemicals.
6.7 Sony Ericsson - Drops 6 places due to losing points on its
e-waste policy and practice.
6.7 LGE -Dropping 2 places, loses point on recycling reporting.
6.7 Apple - Steady rise, new models reducing the use of toxic
chemicals, takeback programme still needs to be global.
6.7 Fujitsu-Siemens - Dropping down, needs toxic elimination timelines
and better reporting of amounts recycled.
6.7 HP - Timeline for eliminating worst toxic chemicals, though not for
all products; needs to improve takeback coverage.
6.3 Motorola - Penalty point for poor takeback practice lifted.
Still no timeline for eliminating the most toxic chemicals.
5.7 Acer - Dropping down. Still no products on the market without
the worst chemicals and needs better takeback coverage
and reporting of amounts recycled.
5 Sharp - Some plus points on toxic chemicals elimination and
slight improvement on takeback policy and practice.
4.7 Panasonic - New to the guide - some plus points on toxic chemicals
elimination but poor takeback policy and practice.
4.7 Microsoft -Improved timeline for toxic chemicals elimination (2010)
but poor takeback policy and practice.
4.3 Philips - Improved toxic chemicals elimination deadline but zero
points on e-waste recycling.
0.3 Nintendo - Tiny improvement but still way behind.
---
反正前五名大概都可說是環保品牌,
最後那幾個不到五分的就請避免購買,
特別是任天堂....不到一分是怎樣.....Orz
--
Tags:
生態環境
All Comments
By Ina
at 2008-03-28T08:51
at 2008-03-28T08:51
By Ula
at 2008-04-01T08:57
at 2008-04-01T08:57
By Adele
at 2008-04-05T09:03
at 2008-04-05T09:03
By Suhail Hany
at 2008-04-09T09:10
at 2008-04-09T09:10
By Hazel
at 2008-04-13T09:16
at 2008-04-13T09:16
By Queena
at 2008-04-17T09:22
at 2008-04-17T09:22
Related Posts
瑞典專家呼吁普及“綠水”概念
By Hedy
at 2008-03-23T15:29
at 2008-03-23T15:29
“概念水”獲2008年斯德哥爾摩水獎
By Erin
at 2008-03-23T15:26
at 2008-03-23T15:26
美國新商機 買回計畫將電子垃圾變黃金
By Christine
at 2008-03-23T13:37
at 2008-03-23T13:37
碳權雙贏 李明博想「綠化」北韓
By Yuri
at 2008-03-23T11:06
at 2008-03-23T11:06
[分享] 丹頂鶴Long Stay重現濕地生機
By David
at 2008-03-23T02:39
at 2008-03-23T02:39