知識+真的是否有知識(哲學角度去探討) - 社會議題
By Frederica
at 2013-10-20T00:00
at 2013-10-20T00:00
Table of Contents
知識+ 真的是否有知識 (哲學角度去探討)
目前已累積有 1,454,204則問題
但實際上有知識的可能佔不到1半
已更新項目:
答非所問。瞎扯鬼扯。比比皆是XXDD
2 個已更新項目:
Justified true belief is a definition of knowledge that is most frequently credited to Plato and his dialogues.[citation needed] The concept of justified true belief states that in order to know that a given proposition is true, one must not only believe the relevant true proposition, but one must
3 個已更新項目:
also have justification for doing so. In more formal terms, a subject S knows that a proposition P is true if and only if:
4 個已更新項目:
1. P is true
2. S believes that P is true, and
3. S is justified in believing that P is true
5 個已更新項目:
This theory of knowledge suffered a significant setback with the discovery of Gettier problems, situations in which the above conditions were seemingly met but that many philosophers disagree that anything is known.
6 個已更新項目:
[1] Robert Nozick suggested a clarification of "justification" which he believed eliminates the problem: the justification has to be such that were the justification false, the knowledge would be false.
7 個已更新項目:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato
目前已累積有 1,454,204則問題
但實際上有知識的可能佔不到1半
已更新項目:
答非所問。瞎扯鬼扯。比比皆是XXDD
2 個已更新項目:
Justified true belief is a definition of knowledge that is most frequently credited to Plato and his dialogues.[citation needed] The concept of justified true belief states that in order to know that a given proposition is true, one must not only believe the relevant true proposition, but one must
3 個已更新項目:
also have justification for doing so. In more formal terms, a subject S knows that a proposition P is true if and only if:
4 個已更新項目:
1. P is true
2. S believes that P is true, and
3. S is justified in believing that P is true
5 個已更新項目:
This theory of knowledge suffered a significant setback with the discovery of Gettier problems, situations in which the above conditions were seemingly met but that many philosophers disagree that anything is known.
6 個已更新項目:
[1] Robert Nozick suggested a clarification of "justification" which he believed eliminates the problem: the justification has to be such that were the justification false, the knowledge would be false.
7 個已更新項目:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato
Tags:
社會議題
All Comments
By Carol
at 2013-10-21T04:12
at 2013-10-21T04:12
有意思的議題!
個人不擅長哲學,僅以個人見解來湊一腳。
以個人所接觸過的版面經驗而言,答非所問,瞎扯鬼扯的最佳解答[知識],的確是存在的!
至於,佔有的比例多與寡,實在也不敢武斷之!
不過,很欣賞與感謝,默默地奉獻所知,貢獻心力為網友解決疑難,專業熱心的義工朋友,真所謂的善知識也!
知識,往往有時空的侷限。百年前的知識,雖也是知識,卻不適用於現在。尤其處在知識爆炸的現在時空,猶如長江後浪推前浪,後後推翻前前。
知識,若譬喻為路標,有了新道路,卻沿用舊路標,那會指引到懸厓峭壁處否?
再以知識如[藥]來比喻,眾所周知,藥即是毒,用得對症,可以[治病],用錯方子,卻會[致命]。
在知識+也一樣!要有當義工的精神。自己懂的,自己受用的,自己經歷過的,如實的提供給有緣網友參考,幫忙解決疑問,甚至是燃眉之急!
這是在回覆者的角度來說,知之為知之,不知則不要胡亂的[指路],害到人還沾沾自喜,自以為是,若有這種心態,是很要不得的!
若站在真心發問者(除自問自答者),瀏覽者的角度而言,則要睜開眼睛,發揮智慧的抉擇,可以採用不能採用,端看自己的慧眼。
市面上也有[偽藥],知識+也有[偽知識],是社會的縮影,一樣米養百樣人,龍蛇雜處,該如何適應
,即或離,信或疑,全部看自己。
比較可憐的是,心智尚未成熟的小朋友,一不小心
吸收了錯誤訊息,極可能造成無可挽回的地步。
所以,奉勸為人父母者,熱心卻無知幼稚的回答者
,千萬要小心慎重,貽笑大方不要緊,耽誤了人的一生,所損陰德可就大囉!
個人淺論參考,敬請指教!
賈亦真 隨筆
By Mary
at 2013-10-24T22:04
at 2013-10-24T22:04
網路匿稱與人格權
http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/question?qi...
請網友指正教導。謝謝。
By Michael
at 2013-10-23T09:57
at 2013-10-23T09:57
沒付錢,想要有多好的答案?
這裡有一大堆自問自答的。
你去翻閱知識+『大師』們的資料,一個個答一題平均有七八十分。
唉唷,我常常5分,7分在賺,大師竟然平均答一題100分。
這裡廣告一大堆,大師們好像都不會踩到廣告版,最佳答題率超高。
By Tom
at 2013-10-24T13:30
at 2013-10-24T13:30
當然!
除了有知識還有姿勢~最厲害的是滋事
如同pp說的,很多相關知識只要『百度..谷歌』就能瞭然
但是..不過..有些事就不是「百度谷歌」哥倆能解決的事
所以知識+還是有它存在的必然性
【答非所問。瞎扯鬼扯。比比皆是XXDD】
老實說,偶就是被這點吸引
這些人的瞎扯淡真的能令人開懷大笑^^
By Eden
at 2013-10-24T17:46
at 2013-10-24T17:46
知識+ 真的是否有知識 (哲學角度去探討)
用現實的角度跟你說
如果有回答到發問者的問題對他而言那就是知識
如果只是以自己的立場設想問題那就是考慮不周
對發問者而言就沒切中他的問題點
不過發問者的程度能不能
判斷那是真知識還是錯誤知識
還有得到兩個以上答案後自己會簡單查證
也是個問題
而一些錯誤最佳知識
也是一些玩知識圈的人去造就出來不是嗎?
By Valerie
at 2013-10-21T00:29
at 2013-10-21T00:29
一種叫盤古
一種叫女媧
最後一種就是人
2013-10-22 22:43:00 補充:
盤古負責開天
女媧負責補天
人類呢?..................
2013-10-23 12:14:47 補充:
推特跟臉書也依樣啊...........
2013-10-23 12:15:08 補充:
都嘛很微博.........
2013-10-23 12:16:06 補充:
知識是給你明心用的...........不是讓人拿來指認別人見性
By Candice
at 2013-10-24T20:37
at 2013-10-24T20:37
可多囉!只希望不管等級高低'要有個品ˋ~~別亂答!
最近奇摩不是有新的知識版主?這下子更亂~
By Vanessa
at 2013-10-22T06:58
at 2013-10-22T06:58
大家都把知識+園地的((知識))這兩字看的太嚴肅了
如果亞戶要在這園區要真正經營的話
應該要去請一些真有專業背景的來站台 解眾惑
而它們的初衷應該只是給個 三教九流的人士 在這區域互助 互動
比較像是意見.知識 交流的概念而設的討論區
設了[級別]的遊戲規則 就有這意味
2013-10-22 16:57:15 補充:
話又說回來~~~
專業人士 能在網上給的解答 也是有其限度
還是要回歸到實際操作~~~現實面
不然它們不就都要喝西北風啦
這裡能給的 最多也是一些方向 建議
說難聽點~~~去谷歌一下的資訊 應該比這裡好粉多吧
吶~~以後會如何呢?
偶沒意見 !
By Lucy
at 2013-10-24T22:38
at 2013-10-24T22:38
>目前已累積有 1,454,204則問題
>但實際上有知識的可能佔不到1半
^^^^^^
By Aaliyah
at 2013-10-24T05:32
at 2013-10-24T05:32
By Megan
at 2013-10-20T13:08
at 2013-10-20T13:08
需仰賴求助者用智慧判斷
遺憾是,發問者正因不懂、茫然無助才來此發問或找解答,如何能有智慧選擇?
有些錯誤解答可能無傷大雅
但例如法律,一經誤導,可能會誤人一生或一命
想到此,有時真覺得沉重,並且想著,知識加真有存在的意義與價值嗎?
By Necoo
at 2013-10-21T22:21
at 2013-10-21T22:21
修行人去接近百萬問題呢?知識家有沒有知識,只有受者用之。至於不認
同者,只有隨緣而視之......................阿彌陀佛
Related Posts
性侵害防治法的立案背景、此法案的基本精神
By Queena
at 2013-10-19T00:00
at 2013-10-19T00:00
請問騎機車這樣會被警察判罰違規的低頭族嗎??
By Candice
at 2013-10-19T00:00
at 2013-10-19T00:00
排灣族相關資料
By Franklin
at 2013-10-19T00:00
at 2013-10-19T00:00
眼睛的保養平常要如何做好~!?
By Olivia
at 2013-10-19T00:00
at 2013-10-19T00:00
轉彎車未讓直行車無發生碰撞
By Delia
at 2013-10-18T00:00
at 2013-10-18T00:00