Re: HR3012法案完成一讀並排入參議院議程 - 移民

我已經寫至少三封信給Grassley...用了三個以前我在IOWA的地址

也許一個人的力量很小,但我們要把自己的觀點告訴senator

遇到大陸的支持者,也盡量分析為何HR3012也是對他門有害,

我朋友跟我說,印度這些移民團體,每年都會游說這個法案

可能往年不成功,但今年出乎意外的竟然通過眾院...(APPLE賺太多了...財團想

要多一些工程師嗎? @__@)


以下是我寫的:

Dear Senator Grassley,

I appreciate your hold upon HR3012, which is a distortion of fairness and
also a negative impact on American's current job market for high-skilled
Americans.

HR3012 is a product of strong lobbying immigration groups made up of majority
of Indian immigrants. Nowadays, immigration demographic has contained 21% of
India, which is an overwhelming percentage; once HR3012 passes, we can
foresee more on the immigration pie chart.

Secondly, I truly believe US definitely views national defense and security
over economic benefit since national security is the root of everything we
build up on this land. High tech industry especially includes many national
secrets itself; I would foresee a future when high-tech industry will be
dominantly controlled by newly immigrants who have strong origins with
foreign countries, which are exactly well-known rivalry enemies to US in the
world.

Now the supporters of HR3012 claimed they would like to be treated as fair in
immigration. However, the result of HR3012 will give them the best benefits
at the cost of all the other immigrants from other countries around the
world. The fairness is not real fairness. Rather, it is preferentially fair
to one major country alone.

Iowa City is my spiritual hometown when I first arrived in US 5 years ago. I
graduated from University of Iowa as a Master of Accounting student and now I
have worked for 3 years in audit, tax, and accounting industry as a
professional. My job is to aid a Taiwanese-owned American company to
reconnect to the international accounting standards so American system can
merge with international one as SEC advocates nowadays.

I am from a democratic country and now US has classed my country as one
candidate to be visa-exempt in the future. I feel proud to be an immigrant to
contribute to the diversity and workforce to US even though I may be just
part of minority group. And I feel deeply proud that my original country has
maintained great relationship with US, which makes us always see US as a
friend, not an enemy.

This country needs people with integrity, those who keep the final gates to
maintain American spirits and security. As a senior member in Senate, I
believe you are the one to keep the gate and will keep the gate in the future.
















※ 引述《cancun (yay)》之銘言：
: 我剛才寫信給Senator了
: 請大家一人一信 向Senator表示反對意見!
: http://www.grassley.senate.gov/contact.cfm
: ________________________
: Message: Senator Grassley -
: Please oppose HR 3012.
: This bill tries to create "equalness" but not "fairness".
: Because the majority of the applications are from India and China, if this
: bill is passed, it works advantage to these two countries only.
: And it's not fair to the rest of world. If you believe in diversity, if you
: believe in true fairness, please opposite this bill.
: Sincerely,
: S
: ※ 引述《nikerniker (nikerniker)》之銘言：
: : 覺得大部分的ROWer都高估15%-10%保護條款了
: : 以EB2為例子,如果仔細想想:
: : fact 1: ROW一年用到50%名額
: : fact 2: TSC積壓了8個月的I-485, NSC則是4個月,兩個Center粗略平均有半年的案件
: : fact 3: 若是HR3012通過了,2012年ROW只有15%名額,2013:10%,2014:10%
: : calculation:
: : TSC+NSC積件半年=25%的名額 (因為fact 1,一年=50%)
: : 2012+2013 ROW的quota=10%+15%=25%
: : conclusion:
: : 只要HR3012一通過,EB2 ROWer 在2014年之前不會有名額
: : 光是積件就可以把兩年的名額消化光
: : 這樣的分析也許粗糙,有些數據高估有些低估,但是得到的結果令人警惕
: : 印度大陸討論區幾乎只分析EB2I 和 EB2C,沒有甚麼ROW的預估分析
: : 更悲觀的假設(比較不可能發生):
: : 如果法案追朔至去年10月起的名額,這段時間通過的EB2約
: : 用了16%的名額(10,11,12,1 四個月: 50% / 12month * 4month =~ 16.6%)
: : 那麼這16%就把2014的名額也用光了,反而會出現ROW排期比印度中國更長
: : 若還沒送EB2 PERM可以考慮轉攻EB2-NIW或EB1了
: : 繼續寫信給Senator吧

--